Petitioner sought withdrawal of bail petition to file fresh regular bail application before trial court. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed petition as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application.
Withdrawal of petition allowed; petition dismissed with liberty to file fresh application for regular bail before trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-18102 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : October 04, 2012
Kalu @ Satender
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.S.D.Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Shekhar Mudgal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Depinder Singh, Advocate, for the complainant.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset
submits that the prosecution evidence is complete and nothing incriminating has come on record against the petitioner.
In view of the above, he prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable him to file fresh application for grant of regular bail before the learned trial court.
Allowed as prayed for.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
October 04, 2012
seema
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi) Judge
Kalu @ Satender
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
