Shilpa Johar v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-17880 of 2011 Date of Decision:23.2.2012
Shilpa Johar
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. N.P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 8.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties and vide order of even date, FIR in question has already been quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. As such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
23.2.2012 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
Shilpa Johar
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court