Prince and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2012 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What did the court decide?
withdrawal of the writ petition
of 2012 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
withdrawal of the writ petition
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CRM No. M-17092 of 2012 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: September 26, 2012 CRM No. M-17092 of 2012 (O&M)
Prince and others …petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. P.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Vide order dated 01.06.2012, petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 was
given liberty to appear before the trial Court and submit their bail bonds. They have been declared proclaimed offender on 13.01.2012. The parties were directed to get their statements recorded before the trial Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record order dated 11.06.2012 to show that the petitioners had appeared before the trial Court and his bail bond was accepted for a sum of Rs. 60,000/-. As per report of the trial Court, the complainant has stated that she has not effected any compromise with the accused Prince, Ved Parkash and Bhupinder Kumar @ Bhindi.
CRM No. M-17092 of 2012 (O&M)
-2-
Accordingly, learned counsel for the petition seeks
withdrawal of the petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of order dated 01.06.2012, the petitioners will appear
before the trial Court.
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE Sepetember 26, 2012 Atul
Prince and others
State of Punjab and others
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court