Allowed
Kanhiya Lal v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/17079/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Held that in view of the compromise between the parties and the statement that custodial interrogation is not required, the petitioner was entitled to pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with conditions to appear before the investigating agency.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted pre-arrest bail to appear before investigating agency till report filing under Section 173 Cr.P.C.