Dismissed
Raj Kumari v. Satnam Singh and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/16818/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-16818 of 2012
Date of Decision: 03.12.2012
Raj Kumari
....Petitioner
Versus
Satnam Singh and another
....Respondents
BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:None for the petitioner.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
Case was adjourned on 31.05.2012 on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner for placing on record certain documents. However, the Order passed on 31.05.2012 has not been complied with in spite of having various opportunities on 12.07.2012, 17.08.2012, 11.09.2012 and 17.10.2012. Today also, neither the learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor the Order dated 31.05.2012 has been complied with. However, it appears that learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested in arguing the case.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
03.12.2012 gurpreet
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Raj Kumari
Satnam Singh and another
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court