Petition pending for adjournment or withdrawal where the State submitted an untraced report; the High Court dismissed the matter as withdrawn on 9.5.2012.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.M-1560 of 2012 Date of Decision:9.5.2012
Danish @ Suresh Kumar and others
.... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, D.A.G. Haryana.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the reply filed by the State submitting therein that untraced report has been submitted in the Court of law, he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition as having been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
9.5.2012 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
Danish @ Suresh Kumar and others
State of Haryana and others
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
