Petitioners withdrew their criminal miscellaneous petition after a compromise, and this Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without prejudice to their rights.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM M-15326 of 2012
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-15326 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.5.2012
Reena Kohli and another
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and Ors.
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. Ravinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that since the matter has been compromised between the parties, he has got the instructions from the petitioners not to press the petition. Thus, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the instant petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
24.5.2012 sjks
Reena Kohli and another
State of Punjab and Ors.
Rameshwar Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
