Gurdeep Singh v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court converted a notice of motion for interim anticipatory bail into an absolute order, finding that the petitioner had joined the investigation and was no longer required for interrogation.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 18.05.2012 directing interim bail was made absolute.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-14829 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.07.2012
Gurdeep Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
- Present: - Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab, assisted by Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.6 dated 24.4.2012 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Women Cell Bathinda, District Bathinda.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail and notice of motion should be made absolute in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gurdeep Singh
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
PARAMJEET SINGH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/14829/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court