The petitioner filed a petition under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail. During the hearing, the petitioner requested to withdraw the petition, which was then allowed by the court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-14449 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: May 21, 2012.
Vikas @ Mantri
... Petitioner(s)
v.
State of Haryana
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Shri Anshuman Dalal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral):
Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case arising out of FIR No.110, dated 21.3.2011, registered at Police Station Kalanaur, District Rohtak under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452, 325, 307, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, prays
that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
As prayed, dismissed as withdrawn.
May 21, 2012. kadyan
[ Paramjeet Singh ] Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas @ Mantri
State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
