Dismissed
Lachhman v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/14380/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-14380 OF 2012(O&M) DECIDED ON : 21.09.2012
Lachhman
...Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Ishan Singh, Advocate for Mr. J. S. Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Lakhmi Chand, as well as, learned counsel for the petitioner have stated at the bar that the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial Court and as such, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Lachhman
State of Haryana
K. C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court