High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.10 dated 19.02.2012 under Section 384 IPC and subsequent proceedings upon receiving a report that parties had reached a compromise. The matter was held personal in nature.
FIR No.10 dated 19.02.2012 and all subsequent proceedings arising from it were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM NO. M-13723 OF 2012 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-13723 OF 2012 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 10.09.2012
Jaswant Singh @ Gagandeep Singh
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Jagjit Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vishal Sharma, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. B. S. Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing FIR No.10 dated 19.02.2012 under Sections 384 of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Kot Dharmu, District Mansa, on the basis of compromise, along with all subsequent proceedings arising from that FIR.
Report from the trial Court has been received in which it is mentioned that parties have arrived at a compromise. The matter involved is personal in nature.
So, in view of the above circumstances and in view of authority reported as, “ Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State
CRM NO. M-13723 OF 2012 (O&M)
-2-
of Punjab and others” 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the
above said FIR stands quashed. Further proceedings in pursuant to that FIR also stands quashed.
Disposed of.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 shalini
(K. C. PURI) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR under Section 384 IPC registered on the basis of compromise should be quashed, §482 CrPC
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and othersRelied on¶17
Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jaswant Singh @ Gagandeep Singh
State of Punjab
another
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
