Mukand Lal was aware of the receipt of the amount of compensation by the petitioner. Respondent No.1-Mukand Lal got purchased a maruti van to the petitioner. However, the said van was being plied by Mukand Lal. Mukand Lal fraudulently committed the theft of the original papers of the so purchased van. After some time, the said van met with an accident. An amount of 6,000/- was received as compensation by Mukand Lal by misrepresenting the facts. Mukand Lal impersonated himself as the petitioner/complainant and got issued the cheque. On pretext of filing an appeal against the award of meagre compensation by the insurance company, Mukand Lal got the signatures/thumb impressions of the petitioner/complainant on certain blank papers. Mukand Lal however joined hands with respondent/accused No.4 Sham Lal, who typed the forged documents and obtained the thumb impressions of the petitioner/complainant on the said documents which were proposed to be used for filing an appeal. It was also assured to the petitioner/complainant by respondents/accused Nos.1 and 4 that the signatures/thumb impressions of the complainant were required for transferring the van in his name. Despite having obtained the signatures/thumb impressions of the petitioner/ complainant, the van was never transferred in his name. In spite of the fact that Mukand Lal took 50,000/- from the complainant in the name of transfer of the said vehicle and the petitioner/complainant was taken to Delhi for getting the vehicle transferred in his name but nothing was done. After waiting for
