Allowed

Angrej Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Aug 2012CRM-M/13263/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR and diary entries. The court relied on a post-litigation settlement report stating the dispute was resolved without pressure, citing precedent.

What did the court decide?

DDR No.36 dated 06.04.2012 and FIR No.21 dated 06.04.2012 and all consequential proceedings are quashed.

Angrej Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and… — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2012)

¶1

CRM No.M-13263 of 2012

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM No.M-13263 of 2012 (O&M)

¶5

Date of decision : 06.08.2012

¶6

Angrej Singh and others

¶7

...Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Punjab and others

¶10

...Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

¶12

Present: Mr. JJS Uppal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶13

Mr. Mehardeep Singh, DAG, Punjab.

¶14

Mr. Vikrant Pujara, Advocate, Mr. CSS Sisodia, Advocate for the complainants.

¶15

JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral)

¶16

This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing of DDR No.36 dated 06.04.2012, registered under Sections 341, 323, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, 'the IPC'), in FIR No.21 dated 06.04.2012 under Sections 323, 324, 506, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Sandaur, District Sangrur, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise, (Annexure P-3) arrived at between the parties.

¶17

While issuing the notice of motion, the parties were

¶18

-2-

¶19

CRM No.M-13263 of 2012

¶20

directed to appear before the trial Court for getting their statements recorded.

¶21

In compliance of the order dated 07.05.2012, report of Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Malerkotla, dated 05.06.2012, has been received in the connected case bearing CRM No.M-13170 of 2012, preferred by the respondent-complaints herein, to the effect that the parties have arrived at an out of Court settlement and the said settlement is genuine and without any pressure.

¶22

In view of the above and taking into consideration the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition is allowed and DDR No.36 dated 06.04.2012, registered under Sections 341, 323, 148, 149 IPC, in FIR No.21 dated 06.04.2012 under Sections 323, 324, 506, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station Sandaur, District Sangrur, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

¶23

06.08.2012

¶24

atulsethi

¶25

(JITENDRA CHAUHAN) JUDGE

¶26

Note : Whether to be referred to Reporter : Yes / No

Angrej Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Angrej Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadhu Singh Vs State of Punjab

(O&M) Harjit Singh etc. Vs State of Punjab

Iqbal Singh Vs Jagir Singh Dhillon and Ors.

Bhupinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Malkit Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Radhika Datta Bhati Vs State of Haryana