Baljeet v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M-13249 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.08.2012
Baljeet
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present:- Mr. Surinder Pal, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sidharth Sarup, DAG, Haryana.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J . (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has already been convicted by the trial Court, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Keeping in view the above fact, the present petition is
disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
21.08.2012 (PARAMJEET SINGH) sonika Judge
Baljeet
State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court