Dismissed
Asha Thakur v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/13114/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.Misc.No.M-13114 of 2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M-13114 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision : 7.5.2012
Asha Thakur
.......Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK,J
Crl.Misc.No.26450 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to just exceptions.
Crl. Misc. application stands disposed of.
Crl.Misc.No.M-13114 of 2012
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has got the alternative remedy, which has not been availed by her, so far.
During the course of hearing, when confronted with the judgement of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and
others, (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409, learned counsel for the petitioner very
fairly states that let this petition be ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
Crl.Misc.No.M-13114 of 2012
2
to the petitioner to avail her alternative remedy, in terms of the law laid down in Sakiri
Vasu's case(supra).
In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the instant petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
However, lest this order is misunderstood, it is made clear that as and when appropriate petition is moved by the petitioner before the concerned authority under Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the same shall be considered dispassionately and expeditiously, passing appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law.
With the observations made above, the instant petition is disposed of.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
7.5.2012 GS
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and othersExplained¶21
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others, (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409
Asha Thakur
State of Haryana
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court