Kirandeep Kaur and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-12284 of 2012 Date of Decision: 11.10.2012
Kirandeep Kaur and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others ....Respondents
BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Gautam Thapar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
Reply on behalf of respondent-State has been filed in the Court today and the same is taken on record. A copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel submit that the private respondents have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. As per reply, the statements of the petitioners as well as private respondents were recorded by the police and the private respondents have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as such.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
11.10.2012 gurpreet
Kirandeep Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court