Petitioner withdrew Criminal Misc. No. M-10062 of 2012 with liberty to represent before the Inquiry Officer at Barnala.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to represent before the Inquiry Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-10062 of 2012 Date of Decision: 11.10.2012
Amarjeet Singh
........Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.......Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Harsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Mr. G.S.Sidhu, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 & 6.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be
allowed to withdraw the present petition with permission to represent for his grievance before the Inquiry Officer i.e. Superintendent of Police, Barnala.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
October 11, 2012
Gagan
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Amarjeet Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
