Petitioner withdrew the writ petition filed against the State of Punjab. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. No substantive legal issue was adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11210-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 3, 2012
Darshna Devi
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Harsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab, for the respondents.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
December 3, 2012 Pkapoor
Darshna Devi
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
