Petition declared infructuous following quashing of related FIR in connected proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M-10794 of 2012 Date of decision : 21.5.2012
Sukhjit Singh @ Sukhi .......Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr.Ramdeep Partap Singh, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl.A.G. Punjab for respondent no.1. Mr. Himmat Singh Shergill, Advocate for respondent no.2.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, fairly states that in view of the order passed today allowing Crl.Misc.No.M-9183 of 2012, whereby the FIR No.32 dated 18.2.1992 under Sections 386, 387 IPC registered at Police Station Division No.5, Ludhiana, has been ordered to be quashed, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is ordered to be disposed of as having been rendered
infructuous.
21.5.2012 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE
Sukhjit Singh @ Sukhi
State of Punjab
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
