Bal Krishan @ Dimpy Kumar v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Order permitting the withdrawal of a writ petition to allow the petitioner to pursue pleas during the trial.
What did the court decide?
Permitted withdrawal of the petition.
Order permitting the withdrawal of a writ petition to allow the petitioner to pursue pleas during the trial.
Permitted withdrawal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CRM-M No. 10652 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.11.2012
Bal Krishan @ Dimpy Kumar
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr.S.K.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Surjeet Singh Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab. ****
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be
permitted to withdraw this petition to enable the petitioner to take up all the pleas available to him during trial.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SABINA) JUDGE
anita
November 21, 2012
Bal Krishan @ Dimpy Kumar
State of Punjab
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court