Maintenance of criminal miscellaneous petition after discharge of petitioners from trial conducted by High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-10636 of 2010(O & M) Date of decision:-13.12.2012
N.D. Sharma and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present:Mr. Tavinder Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh.
PARAMJEET SINGH J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been discharged by the trial court and hence the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
December 13, 2012 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
N.D. Sharma
State of U.T. Chandigarh
PARAMJEET SINGH
VIJAY ASIJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
