Sanjay S/O Sukhbir v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-10448 OF 2012 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 03.09.2012.
Sanjay
...Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Ms. Neeru Bansal , Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana with Ms. Ginny Ghuman Anand, DAG, Haryana.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ved Singh, has stated at the bar that the trial has been concluded and the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial Court and as such, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
SEPTEMBER 03 , 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Sanjay
State of Haryana
K. C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court