Petitioner's criminal miscellaneous petition was disposed of as infructuous after the trial court's acquittal of the accused; counsel for petitioner did not press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Crl.Misc.No. M-1039 of 2012. Date of Decision:- 18.12.2012.
Sanjeev alias Sanju
Petitioner.
Versus
State of Haryana and another
Respondents.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Present: - Mr.S.K.Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anupam Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sanjay Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J.
Learned counsel for the State counsel submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous since the accused have already been acquitted by the learned trial court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition.
Disposed of.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
18.12.2012.
Anoop
Sanjeev alias Sanju
State of Haryana
another
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
