The judge dismissed the civil revision petition as the petitioner sought to withdraw it, being rendered infructuous due to the final disposal of the underlying suit by the trial court.
Permission to withdraw the civil revision petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision Petition No.80 of 2010 Date of decision : January 17, 2012
The State of Haryana
....Petitioner
versus
Murti Mari Guga Peer Mandir
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal
Present : Mr. SS Goripuria, DAG Haryana for the petitioner
Mr. RK Sharma, Advocate for the respondent
L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision petition because the same has been rendered infructuous as the suit out of which this revision petition has arisen has since been decided finally by the trial court.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( L.N. Mittal )
January 17, 2012 Judge 'dalbir'
The State of Haryana
Murti Mari Guga Peer Mandir
L.N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
