Petitioner sought to withdraw an instant revision petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the revision petition and the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Case No. : C. R. No. 6194 of 2012
Date of Decision : October 17, 2012
Rajinder Kumar Dhanakar .... Petitioner Vs.
Birbal and another .... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. Jayoti Parshad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time,
seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
October 17, 2012 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE
Rajinder Kumar Dhanakar
Birbal and another
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
