The petitioner stated that the parties had compromised the matter. The High Court disposed of the pending civil revision petition based on this statement of compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 6025 of 2003
Date of decision: October 30, 2012
Guru Gobind Singh Educational Society (Retd.) Muktsar
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Dr. Babita Singh and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Ms. Amarjit Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
A.N. Jindal, J
Ms. Amarjit Kaur, Advocate appearing for the arguing counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate, has stated at bar that the parties have compromised the matter.
In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of.
October 30, 2012 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
Guru Gobind Singh Educational Society (Retd.) Muktsar
Dr. Babita Singh
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
