The High Court dismissed the instant civil revision petition, which was based on reasons already recorded in a connected revision petition (Civil Revision No.4862 of 2011 titled Hans Raj Versus H.M.T. Ltd.) decided on the even date.
The instant revision petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CIVIL REVISION NO.4863 OF 2011 DATE OF DECISION: FABRUARY 9, 2012
Gurjinder Singh
.... Petitioner
Versus
HMT Limited & others
.... Respondents
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.
PRESENT: Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anand Chhibbar, Advocate for the respondents.
L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
For reasons recorded in order of even date passed in connected Civil Revision No.4862 of 201 1 titled Hans Raj Versus M/s.H. M. T. Ltd.
and others , the instant revision petition is also dismissed.
(L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE
09.02.2012 'raj'
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hans Raj Versus M/s.H. M. T. Ltd. and othersFollowed¶14
Civil Revision No.4862 of 2011
Gurjinder Singh
HMT Limited
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
