The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held a civil revision petition infructuous because the plaint underlying the dispute was rejected by the trial Court, and disposed of the matter accordingly.
The revision petition was disposed of as it was rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 2132 of 2010 Date of Decision : 9th February, 2012
Air Impact India Pvt. Ltd. & others
.... Petitioner
Versus
Haryana Financial Corporation & others
.... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. Bhal Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Arun K. Kaundal, Advocate for Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
Learned counsel for the petitioners having sought instructions pursuant to order dated 06.09.2011 states that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous because the plaint out of which this revision petition has arisen, has since been rejected by the trial Court.
Accordingly the instant revision petition is disposed of as
having been rendered infructuous.
9th February, 2012 ( L. N. MITTAL ) 'raj' JUDGE
Air Impact India Pvt. Ltd. & others
Haryana Financial Corporation & others
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
