In this revision petition challenging an order permitting electric wire installation on petitioners' property, the Court found no prima facie case to sustain the claim regarding technical feasibility or transformer load, dismissing the objection.
Challenge in revision petition dismissed and orders of Courts below sustained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
C.R. No.4564 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.4564 of 2012 Date of Decision.15.10.2012
Randhir Singh resident of village Raja Kheri, Tehsil and District Panipat and others .....Petitioners
Versus
XEN “OP” Division, Samalkha, Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd., District Panipat and others ....Respondents
Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Hooda, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. V.K. Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.3.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
-2-
C.R. No.4564 of 2012
No.2616 could be installed through the tubewell connections in Khasra No.2624 or 2588. The tubewell connection installed in Khasra No.2588 was at 660 feet away from the transformer installed in Khasra No.2024 known as Jagdish Wala Transformer.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
October 15, 2012 Pankaj*
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a prima facie case exists regarding the feasibility of electric wire installation over private property and its impact on transformer load.
Whether the Electricity Board has breached statutory regulations or rules in laying electric wires over private land.
Randhir Singh and others
XEN "OP" Division, Samalkha and others
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
