Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 (implied by Art 227 context) seeking directions to expedite trial due to physical handicap. The trial court was directed to expedite the trial, and the petition was disposed of.
Directed the trial court to expedite the trial of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No. 434 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.3.2012
Amitabh Bhushan
................Petitioner
vs.
Sheetal Bhushan
.................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. Divya Suri, Advocate for Sh. Amar Vivek, Advocate for the petitioner.
K.C. Puri, J.
This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to expedite the trial on the ground that the petitioner is physically handicapped suffering from serious Neurological disorder.
Report of the trial Court has been received, in which it is mentioned that the case is fixed for evidence of the petitioner on 27.3.2012.
So, in these circumstances, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
The petition stands disposed of.
( K.C. Puri ) 21.3.2012 Judge
chugh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court was directed to expedite the trial due to the petitioner's physical handicap.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amitabh Bhushan
Sheetal Bhushan
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
