Application petition dismissed as tenant had vacated premises and handed over possession, rendering proceedings infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CR-4175 of 1999 (O&M) Decided on February 02,2012
Mulkh Raj --Petitioner
Vs.
Durga Dass --Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr.J.V.Chandel,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.S.M.Sharma,Advocate, for the respondent
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,J: (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent/tenant has stated at the bar
that as per his instructions, the tenant has already vacated the demised premises and has handed over possession to the landlord.
In view thereof, this petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as such.
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
February 02,2012 RR
Mulkh Raj
Durga Dass
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
