Disposed
Gulshan Kuamr v. Tek Chand and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/682/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
**** CR No.682 of 2012 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION:01.02.2012 **** Gulshan Kumar . . . . Petitioner Vs. Tek Chand and another . . . Respondents ** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN** **** Present: Mr.S.K. Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. ****
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to argue the case on merits. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed on merits. However, he submits that he requires sometime to vacate the demised premises to search for an alternate accommodation.
In view thereof, without issuing notice to the respondents, a period of 3 months is granted to the petitioner to vacate the demised premises on or before 1.5.2012 subject to his furnishing an undertaking in this regard before the Rent Controller within a period of one month from today, on payment of all the arrears of rent, if any due and the rent of the ensuing months till he retains possession of the demised premises under the order of this Court. It is needless to mention that in case of any violation of the undertaking, the petitioner shall be liable for contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
FEBRUARY 01, 2012 Vivek
Gulshan Kumar
Tek Chand
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court