Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a civil revision petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Dismissal of the civil revision petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CIVIL REVISION NO.3226 OF 2012 DATE OF DECISION : 24th MAY 2012
Vinod Kumar
…. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana & others
…. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. Ashwani Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy whatsoever is available with the petitioner under the law.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforesaid.
24th May, 2012 (L. N. MITTAL) ‘raj’ JUDGE
Vinod Kumar
The State of Haryana
L. N. MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
