The High Court, in an oral order dated May 23, 2012, dismissed a contempt petition as withdrawn by consent, noting that the parties had compromised and were residing together.
Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Case No. : COCP No. 2162 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 23, 2012
Harbhajan Kaur
.... Petitioner
Vs.
Sarabjit Singh and another .... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. Munish Behl Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for respondent no. 1.
Petitioner and respondent no. 1 also in person.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
Parties state that they have effected compromise and they are residing together as wife and husband. Accordingly, as prayed by petitioner and her counsel, the instant contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
May 23, 2012 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE
Harbhajan Kaur
Sarabjit Singh
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
