Allowed

Jastej Singh Chhina v. Balwant Singh Sandhu & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Jan 2012CR/3197/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil revision petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court allowed the petition, set aside the dismissal of the first appeal in default, and restored the matter to the appellate court with a call for a cost payment.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; first appeal and application for condonation of delay restored to lower appellate Court files upon payment of Rs.10,000 cost precedent.

Jastej Singh Chhina Vs Balwant Singh… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2012)

¶1

CR No.3197 of 2011

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CIVIL REVISION NO.3197 OF 2011 DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 06, 2012

¶5

Jastej Singh Chhina

¶6

.... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Balwant Singh & others

¶9

.... Respondents

¶10

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.

¶11

PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Sood, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. H. N. S. Gill, Advocate for respondents.

¶13

¶14

L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Jastej Singh Chhina defendant has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 24.01.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Mohali.

¶16

Suit filed by respondents/plaintiffs for ejectment of defendantpetitioner from the disputed premises and for recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits has been decreed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 15.02.2010 Annexure P-2. Defendant-petitioner preferred first appeal against judgment and decree of the trial Court. The said appeal was barred by limitation. Defendant-petitioner moved application for condonation of delay in filing the first appeal. Issues were framed on the said application and the first appeal was posted for 24.01.2011 for evidence of the applicant i.e. petitioner herein. However on that date, none appeared for the petitioner before the lower appellate Court and accordingly application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal was dismissed in default and the appeal was consequently dismissed as time barred

¶17

CR No.3197 of 2011

¶18

-2-

¶19

vide impugned order dated 24.01.2011 Annexure P-1. The said order is under challenge in the instant revision petition.

¶20

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that his counsel could not appear in the lower appellate Court nor informed the petitioner that the case was fixed for his evidence and therefore, non-appearance in the lower appellate Court was not intentional.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand contended that the petitioner is intentionally delaying the disposal of first appeal because decree for recovery of rent and damages is to be executed against him.

¶23

I have carefully considered the matter.

¶24

Keeping in view all the circumstances and the liberal approach adopted by Courts in such matter, I am of the considered opinion that ends of justice would be met if the first appeal along with application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is restored to the files of the lower appellate Court on payment of cost.

¶25

Revision petition is accordingly allowed. Impugned order Annexure P-1 passed by the lower appellate Court is set aside and first appeal along with application for condonation of delay in filing the first appeal is restored to the files of the lower appellate Court, subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as cost precedent.

¶26

Parties are directed to appear before the lower appellate Court on

¶27

10.02.2012.

¶28

(L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE

¶29

06.01.2012 'raj'

Jastej Singh Chhina v. Balwant Singh Sandhu & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jastej Singh Chhina v. Balwant Singh Sandhu & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surjit Singh Vs Balwinder Kaur and Ors.

Ravneet Bhatwa Vs Mala Bhatwa

Sumit Verma Vs Raj Paul Gulati & Anr.

Raj Kumar Vs Mohinder Singh

Ram Kishan Vs Man Singh & Ors.

Manoj Kumar & Anr. Vs Anil