Civil Revision No. 2970 of 2011 was dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the matter, citing a compromise between the parties. About 7.5.2012
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 2970 of 2011 (O&M)
M/s Bansal Wool Traders and another
..... Petitioners
vs
Bharat Kumar Soni and others
..... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Deepak Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Yogesh Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate, for the respondents.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter in dispute having been compromised between the parties, he seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
7.5.2012
vs.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
M/s Bansal Wool Traders and another
Bharat Kumar Soni and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
