In this civil revision, counsel argued the petition was infructuous because the main suit was dismissed as withdrawn. The single-judge bench disposed of the matter by dismissing the revision as infructuous.
Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1821 of 2012 (O&M)
Kuldeep
..... Petitioner
vs
Rajkapoor and another
..... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Anil Ghanghas, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the main suit filed by the respondent no.1- plaintiff has been dismissed as withdrawn.
Dismissed as infructuous.
15.5.2012
vs.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition is maintainable when the principal suit has been dismissed as withdrawn.
Kuldeep
Rajkapoor
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
