The resident judicial order rendering the petition infructuous allowed the revision petition to be dismissed as having become infructuous. No substantive legal principle is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.1404 of 1996 Date of decision: 03.12.2012
The Chandigarh Housing Board
……Petitioner
Versus
Kashmir Singh and others
…….Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present: Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
A.N. Jindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present
petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
03.12.2012 ajp
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
The Chandigarh Housing Board
Kashmir Singh and others
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
