Tarsem Kumar v. M.P. Arora
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposal of contempt petition due to lack of cause to continue, with liberty to appeal; rule discharged.
What did the court decide?
Rule discharged; liberty granted to appeal.
Disposal of contempt petition due to lack of cause to continue, with liberty to appeal; rule discharged.
Rule discharged; liberty granted to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P. No.930 of 2012
DATE OF DECISION: May 10, 2012
Tarsem Kumar
…..Petitioner
versus
Sh. M.P. Arora
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
Present: Mr.Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate for the respondent
..
SURYA KANT, J. : (Oral)
Reply-affidavit filed in court is taken on record. OrderAnnexure R/1 deciding the petitioner’s representation is attached therewith.
Leaving no cause to continue with this contempt petition, it is disposed of accordingly.
Rule discharged.
If the petitioner is aggrieved against the said order,
liberty is granted to him to impugn the same before the appropriate forum.
May 10, 2012 (SURYA KANT) pc JUDGE
Tarsem Kumar
Sh. M.P. Arora
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court