In a contempt proceeding, the petitioner was adjusted as Guest Faculty, removing the cause for the proceedings, which were accordingly dropped and the petition disposed of.
Contempt proceedings were dropped and the petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P.No.791 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : May 02, 2012
Manisha Kumari
.....Petitioner
versus
Smt.Surina Rajan and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.Satbir Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajiv Kawetra, Senior DAG, Haryana.
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Short reply has been filed in Court by the respondents which is
taken on record.
It is explained in the short reply that the petitioner has now been adjusted as Guest Faculty vide order dated 24.4.2012, leaving no cause to continue with these contempt proceedings which are accordingly dropped.
The contempt petition stands disposed of.
May 02, 2012 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE
Manisha Kumari
Smt.Surina Rajan and others
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
