Sarabjit Kaur v. T.R. Sarangal and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought revival of contempt proceedings due to delay in finalizing seniority list and filling vacancies. Court recorded satisfaction that action would be taken within two months. Contempt petition disposed of with direction that if needful action is not taken, petitioner can seek revival of proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition disposed of; direction given to fill vacancies within two months;留着 right to revive proceedings if default occurs.