This oral judgment disposed of a long-pending order in a contempt petition regarding the definition of a 'Court' under the Contempt of Courts Act. The court deemed the case infructuous and dropped the proceedings.
Rule discharged and proceedings dropped as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
COCP No.253 of 1996 Date of Decision: March 19, 2012
Ram Singh
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Gurcharan Singh, Tehsildar (Sale), Ambala ..... RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
PRESENT: - None.
. . .
Surya Kant, J (Oral)
COCP No.1038 of 1996 [2]
the petitioner's request, the earlier allotment was cancelled and fresh allotment of land has been made to satisfy his complete claim.
(Surya Kant)
March 19, 2012 Judge avin
Ram Singh
Gurcharan Singh
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
