The petitioner argued the order had been complied with. The court held proceedings were unnecessary and were accordingly dropped.
The contempt proceedings were dropped and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P.No.2398 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : March 21, 2012
Mohinder Singh Hooda versus
Sh.K.K.Jalan and another
.....Petitioner
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.Dinesh Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the order has since been complied with.
In this view of the matter, there is no necessity to continue
with these proceedings which are accordingly dropped.
The contempt petition stands disposed of.
March 21, 2012 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE
Mohinder Singh Hooda
Sh.K.K.Jalan and another
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
