The single judge allowed the petition by noting the prior order dated 3.11.2011 was complied with, thereby dropping the contempt proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P.No.220 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision : March 02, 2012
Jagpal Singh
.....Petitioner
versus
G.Vajralingam and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Cheema, Senior DAG, Punjab.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the order dated 3.11.2011 has since been complied with.
In this view of the matter, there is no cause to continue with these contempt proceedings which are accordingly dropped.
The contempt petition stands disposed of.
March 02, 2012
Mohinder JUDGE
Jagpal Singh
G.Vajralingam and others
Surya Kant
Mohinder
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
