Dismissed
Raj Kumar v. Arun Kumar & Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCOCP/1795/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
COCP No. 1795 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 22nd May, 2012.
Raj Kumar
Petitioner through
Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate
Versus
Arun Kumar and Ors. Respondents through Mr. Naveen Sheoran, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL]
The respondent has filed reply/affidavit along with details
of the payment made. It is also stated that the petitioner has acknowledged the receipt of payment.
This petition is accordingly disposed of. If there is still any
pending claim, the petitioner may approach the Competent Authority
who shall consider the same in accordance with law.
Rule discharged.
Disposed of. Dasti .
May 22, 2012. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE
Raj Kumar
Arun Kumar and Ors.
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court