In this contempt petition COCP 1707 of 2012, the petitioner sought disposal in terms of an undertaking given by respondents' counsel in a related matter (COCP 1927 of 2012) wherein an order dated 30.7.2012 required appropriate considerations within one month. The petition was disposed of on the same lines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 1707 of 2012 (O&M)
Pintu and others
.. Petitioners
vs
Shri Rakesh Singh and others
... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satish Bhanot, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that another contempt petition bearing COCP No. 1927 of 2012 Parveen Kumar and another vs Shri K. B. S. Sidhu, IAS and another where the petitioners therein had approached this court alleging violation of order passed by this court in their favour for consideration of their claim for employment under Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme dated 8.11.1993, was disposed of vide order dated 30.7.2012, taking note of the undertaking given by counsel for the respondents therein that appropriate order considering the cases of the petitioners therein, in terms of the aforesaid policy, shall be passed within one month from the date of the order.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the present petition be also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.
Learned for the State did not dispute the aforesaid factual position.
Considering the aforesaid stand of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 30.7.2012 passed in Parveen Kumar' s case (supra).
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
13.8.2012 vs
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present contempt petition should be disposed of in accordance with the undertaking given in another related contempt petition dated 30.7.2012.
Whether the respondents' counsel has given an undertaking to pass an appropriate order considering the petitioners' claim for employment under the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Parveen Kumar and another vs Shri K. B. S. Sidhu, IAS and anotherReferred¶11
COCP No. 1927 of 2012 (Parveen Kumar and another vs Shri K. B. S. Sidhu, IAS and another)
Pintu and others
Shri Rakesh Singh and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
