The Court held that the contempt petition became infructuous as the prayed relief was already granted, and consequently discharged the rule and dismissed the petition.
Rule discharged and contempt petition dismissed as the prayed relief had been granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P. No.1293 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 03, 2012
Madho Ram & another
...Petitioners
Versus
Santosh Kumari & another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.H.N. Khanduja, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Ms.Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Counsel for the petitioners says that the necessary relief, as prayed for in the petition, has been granted. The contempt petition, therefore, is rendered infructuous.
Rule discharged.
Petition is dismissed.
October 03, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
Madho Ram
Santosh Kumari
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
