Appeal dismissed due to the appellants' complete absence despite multiple notices and last opportunity granted, resulting in dismissal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.4797 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 3rd MARCH, 2011
Chiranji Lal & others
.... Appellants
Versus
Baldev Singh & others
.... Respondents
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.
PRESENT: None.
L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Inspite of last opportunity granted for today, none is appearing for the appellants inspite of pass-over. None either appeared for the appellants on all the three preceding dates of hearing.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE
3rd March, 2011 'raj'
Chiranji Lal & others
Baldev Singh & others
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
