The High Court dismissed the appellant for non-prosecution as no party appeared despite multiple adjournments and available chances to proceed with the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.2285 of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: 07.03.2011
Manmit Singh
……Appellant
Versus
Amarjit Kaur
…...Respondent
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.
Present: None.
L.N. MITTAL, J (ORAL)
In spite of last opportunity granted for today, none is appearing for the appellant, although the case was even passed over once. None either appeared for the appellant on the preceding two dates of hearing.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE
07.03.2011 A.kaundal
Manmit Singh
Amarjit Kaur
L.N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
