Revision petition filed against an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra was dismissed when petitioner counsel requested withdrawal of the petition during the hearing.
None. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Rev. No.360 of 2010
Date of Decision: 04.03.2011
Tek Chand
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
**
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
This is a revision petition against the order dated 24.09.2009
passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be
permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
04.03.2011 gurpreet
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) JUDGE
Tek Chand
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
